Saturday, November 9, 2013

Literary Devices in Johann Gerhard's Devotional Writings

Johann Gerhard, 17th-century German theologian
[Prayer] is a ladder by which we ascend to heaven, for prayer is nothing else than a drawing near of the mind to God.  It is a shield of defence, because the soul that liveth daily in a spirit of prayer is secure from the insults of devils.  Prayer is a faithful messenger we send to the throne of God, to call Him to our aid in the time of need.[1]
That just constitutes a sampling of the engaging poetic imagery Johann Gerhard pens in his devotional books.  Born in 1582 and living until 1637, the German theologian studied in the age of Lutheran Scholasticism following the publication of the Book of Concord, which he helped support by way of his outstanding doctrinal literature, the Loci.  However, alongside of this, he assisted in building up the collection of short sacred contemplations accessible for personal use.  In this genre, he idiomized a metaphorical style influential to later authors of the cultural Pietist flavor.  Overall, these metaphorical devices of Gerhard’s devotional writings as a rule directly quote Scripture or paraphrase it using accurate hermeneutics.
            First of all, extended metaphors typically influenced by Biblical parables encompass substantial paragraphs, even in alternation.  Popularly, Gerhard likens the salvation story to a marriage relationship between the soul and Christ, and weaves in many other familiar types as well.                                                                                                                                 
Jacob served fourteen years to win Rachel for his wife, but Christ for nearly thirty years endured hunger, thirst, cold, poverty…Samson went down and sought a wife from among the Philistines, a people devoted to destruction, but the Son of God came down from heaven to choose HHHis bride from among men condemned…Foul and defiled was His bride, but He anointed her with the oil of His mercy and grace.[2]
Amongst other notable figures the author features are the vine and branches, the robe of righteousness, the flood of baptism, evening and morning, the oil of faith, and the Shepherd and sheep.
Next, Gerhard often utilizes the technique of repeatedly comparing and contrasting two people or objects, such as the sinner and the Savior, in order to make a point.  Furthermore, this can be used for either a Law comfort or Gospel promise.  For example, “If this be done in a green tree, what shall be done in a dry (Luke 23:31)? If this be done to the Just and Holy One, what shall be done to sinners?”[3]  On the other hand, in discussing the blessings brought to the Christian by the Passion, Gerhard lists many points of deference between their state and their Redeemer’s.  Here is a mere sampling: 
He willingly submitted to be stripped of His garments, that He might restore to us the robe of innocence, lost through our transgressions.  He was pierced with thorns,
that He might heal our sin-pierced hearts.  He bore the burden of the cross, so that He might remove from us the awful burden of eternal punishment.[4]
Third, Gerhard uses analogies either drawn from plain understanding or explained by perspicuous biblical passages in order to express a correct exegetical inference.  In “Loving God Alone” from Sacred Meditations, he supports from the conclusion that if God is perfect and most loving as the Creator, one should reciprocate that love rather than to other creatures. 
Does not that man do himself injury who loves anything beneath the dignity of his nature?  Our souls are far more noble than any created thing because redeemed by the passion and death of God.  Why then should we stoop to love the creature?...Whatever we love, we love because of its power, its wisdom, or its beauty.  Now what is more powerful, what is wiser, what is more beautiful, than God?[5]
In the “Prayer for Victory Over Temptations and for Safe-Keeping from the Devil’s Plots,” Gerhard applies the scale of Christ’s temptations to the weak believers’. 
If he dared to attempt to make himself commander of the heavenly army, will he keep himself from me, a common soldier?  If he did not think twice to oppose the
very Head (Matthew 4:3), is there any wonder that he attempts to destroy a weak member of the mystical body?[6]
            Fourth of all, sometimes Gerhard brings out the simplicity of a truth by means of very short sentences, frequently to compare and contrast, even directly citing Scripture.  “I despair of myself.  In You, hope is repaired.  Of myself, I fail.  In You, I am restored.  In me, there is anguish.  In You, I find joy once again.”[7]  In regard to the “Denial of Self”:  It is better for me to be nothing in You and receive Your everything than to be something in and of myself and have nothing.  Where I am not, there I am happier.  My weakness longs to be strengthened by Your might.  My nothingness reaches for Your strength.”[8]
In a “Thanksgiving for Preservation” prayer, to bring out the truth that everything needed to sustain life belongs to God, Gerhard assembles a chain of short sentences to bring home the reality:
In You, I bend and move my limbs.  Without You, I cannot participate in life and movement…The day belongs to You.  The night belongs to You…Silver is Yours.  Gold is Yours.[9]
            Lastly, Gerhard views the Bible in light of the theology of the cross, and also Christocentrically.  Any conclusions he draws are based on keeping the message of Christ’s atoning act central, accentuating the Messianic typology already found in Scripture.  To
ignore such clear signs would be an exegetical crime, and would even render the interpretation more obscure. 
            In the end, all of the abovementioned literary tools are utilized by Gerhard for a poetic effect, organizational quality, interest, and finally as Scriptural basis for his seemingly subjective ideas.  Though some may attribute his heavy usage of metaphors to the foreshadowing of Pietism, they still fall in line with Lutheran orthodoxy in that most are drawn from the Bible.  In including types and descriptive language, Gerhard does not introduce foreign doctrine or misleading analogies that would suggest improper hermeneutics.  Rather, they act as his paintbrush to color biblical concepts, only serving to direct the appreciator towards the perfectly designed model of Holy Scripture.




[1]Johann Gerhard, Sacred Meditations, Malone, TX:  Repristination Press, 1998, 138.

[2]Ibid., 73-4.
[3] Ibid., 18.
[4] Ibid., 42-43.
[5] Ibid., 50. 
[6]Gerhard, Meditations on Divine Mercy, 123.
[7]Ibid., 47. 
[8] Ibid., 117. 
[9] Ibid., 60.  

No comments:

Post a Comment